ENGLISH · LESSON 08 OF 20

Separate stated evidence from an assumption

What this lesson helps you do

Preserve quantities, conditions and uncertainty when interpreting a text.

Before this lesson

This lesson builds on:

The explanation

A statement can be directly supported, contradicted, or left unresolved by a passage. Absence of evidence for a statement is different from evidence that it is false. Read the exact claim, including words such as some, all, only and may. A small change in one of these words can turn a supported claim into an unsupported one.

Inference connects information in a text, but it should remain within what the text reasonably supports. If a notice says a room closes at six, it does not tell us why. An attractive explanation based on personal experience is still an assumption unless the passage supplies evidence for it.

For IELTS-specific question formats, follow the wording of the actual instructions: information questions and writer-view questions are not interchangeable labels. This lesson demonstrates the underlying reading distinction through fully explained examples; it does not ask you to submit answers or predict an examination score.

Language pattern

Pattern
Exact claim → relevant evidence → supported, contradicted or unresolved interpretation.
What it does
Compare meanings, including their scope.
Limits
An interpretation may be plausible without being established by the text.

A first worked example

Preserve some rather than all

Situation. Original notice: “Some evening workshops will move online in November. The daytime timetable will remain unchanged.”

Model text

The notice supports a change to at least part of the evening programme. It contradicts a claim that the daytime timetable will change. It does not establish that all evening workshops will move online.

Why it works

  • Some limits the scope of the first statement.
  • Unchanged directly addresses the daytime timetable.
  • The notice gives no complete count of evening workshops.

What it shows: A statement about part of a group cannot automatically be expanded to the whole group.

A second worked example

Do not invent a reason

Situation. Original notice: “The reading room will close at 18:00 on Thursday.”

Model text

Thursday’s closing time is stated. A claim that repairs caused the early closure is unresolved because the notice gives no reason.

Why it works

  • The time is directly available.
  • “Because repairs are scheduled” would add information that is not present.
  • The reader must not treat an unstated cause as either confirmed or disproved.

What it shows: Accurate reading sometimes ends with “the text does not tell us”.

Common mistakes

  • Draft (not correct): No reason is given, so repairs definitely are not planned.

    Revision: The reason is not stated.

    Missing information does not prove its opposite.

  • Draft (not correct): May improve means definitely improves.

    Revision: May improve expresses a possibility.

    The modal verb affects the strength of the claim.

Keep in mind

  • Track words that limit scope.
  • Keep facts separate from plausible explanations.
  • Do not turn an unknown into a definite claim.

Foundation lesson; not an official syllabus, accredited CEFR placement, or score prediction.

Next: Paraphrase and summarise without changing the claim. Restate a source accurately and distinguish a short summary from a close paraphrase.

Original Bayt Al-Fuad teaching text and invented examples; not publisher lesson text. Aligned with: The Official Cambridge Guide to IELTS: published contents, ISBN 9781107620698 · Reading Comprehension — Joel Gonzaga. Sources and credits.